EU court ‘should not intervene’ in Croatia-Slovenia border dispute

File photo. Cars queue up at the official temporary border between Croatia and Slovenia at the Piran Bay, 13 June 2010. [Antonio Bat/EPA/EFE]

An adviser at the EU Court of Justice agreed with Croatia on Wednesday (11 December) that settling the border between Slovenia and Croatia was not a matter on which EU courts should rule.

The dispute over the contested northern Adriatic waters and a sliver of land between Zagreb and Ljubljana dates back to the 1991 break-up of Yugoslavia. Slovenia, which joined the EU in 2004, blocked Croatia’s accession talks in 2008 because of the border issue.

The two sides eventually agreed to hand the matter over to the international tribunal in The Hague and the agreement allowed Croatia to resume membership talks and join the bloc in 2013. The deal was included in Croatia’s accession agreement in order to stop Slovenia vetoing its membership.

Slovenia had argued that, by not implementing an arbitration tribunal’s determination in 2017 of the land and sea border between Croatia and Slovenia, Croatia was violating EU law and could be sued under EU law.

Croatia and Slovenia continue maritime dispute after arbitration ruling

Croatia has rejected an international tribunal’s border ruling that gave neighbouring Slovenia access to international waters just off Croatia’s coast, in a move that might create new obstacles for future EU enlargement in the Balkans.

“Determining that boundary is, by its very nature, a matter of public international law in respect of which the court does not have jurisdiction,” Advocate General Priit Pikamae said in his non-binding opinion on Wednesday.

The dispute risks complicating Croatia’s accession to the Schengen border-free area. The European Commission has said Croatia met technical criteria for accession, but Slovenia is unhappy with Croatia’s rejection of the arbitration ruling, which might affect Slovenia’s stance on Croatia’s Schengen hopes.

Slovenia says it would be ‘very funny’ if Croatia joined Schengen

Slovenia on Monday (4 September) warned fellow EU member Croatia that failure to implement the Piran ruling will amount to a breach of the EU’s rule of law.

The problem also affects fishermen of both countries in the zone where the maritime border has not yet been agreed upon.

Slovenian Foreign Minister Miro Cerar told a news conference later on Wednesday that he believed the court would not follow the adviser’s guidance, adding the opinion and consequent court decision “has no influence on the validity of the arbitration ruling” regarding the border.

Slovenian Prime Minister Marjan Šarec told reporters Slovenia remains adamant that the arbitration ruling on the border between the two states has to be implemented.

Croatian Prime Minister Andrej Plenković welcomed the adviser’s opinion and invited Slovenia on a dialogue to resolve the problem.

“We are friendly countries and we’re ready to seek in a dialogue a solution which would satisfy both countries. I expect some moves in that direction in the coming months,” Plenković said at the beginning of a cabinet session in Zagreb.

Zagreb does not want to implement the arbitration ruling saying Slovenia improperly meddled with the arbitration process.

The court itself will likely rule in two to four months on the matter. It typically follows the opinions of its advocate generals.

Subscribe to our newsletters