The President of the European Commission used his State of the Union speech to call for member states to adopt an emergency refugee distribution system, ignoring that his similar plan of a lesser scale was rejected last May. EURACTIV France reports.
The violence of the refugee crisis may force Europe to overhaul its asylum policy.
For Juncker, who hopes to convince EU member states to accept the mandatory distribution of 160,000 refugees, this would be a positive step. In order to achieve this, the Dublin Regulation, which forces refugees to apply for asylum in the first EU country they arrive in, and is often accused of destroying solidarity between EU countries, would have to be altered or suspended.
Such an ambitious policy would require a fundamental change in attitude among EU leaders, who in May refused a similar distribution plan for just 40,000 refugees.
>>Read: MEP: Dublin II migrant law is killing European solidarity
In his first State of the Union speech to the European Parliament in Strasbourg on Wednesday (9 September), Commission President Juncker asked member states to show more solidarity, and pointed out that the influx of refugees represented “only 0.11% of the European population”. French radical left MEP Marie-Christine Vergiat added that in the developing countries affected by the crisis, refugees average 13% of the population.
The urgency of the migration crisis will force the EU to review the list of safe countries of origin and examine the system of distribution for asylum seekers, two issues that have been blocked at European level for years.
>>Read: EU leaders shy away from revamping the asylum policy
“I invite member states to adopt the Commission’s proposals on the emergency resettling of 160,000 refugees during the extraordinary meeting of the Home Affairs Council on 14 September,” Jean-Claude Juncker said.
Mandatory solidarity
This figure includes the 40,000 refugees rejected by member states in May, as well as a further 120,000 that have recently arrived through Greece, Italy and Hungary, the EU’s main entry points.
Germany (31,443) and France (24,031) would shoulder the bulk of the burden, followed by Spain (14,931), Poland (9,287) and the Netherlands (7,214).
United Kingdom, Ireland and Denmark exempt
The United Kingdom, Ireland and Denmark, who have opt-outs for migratory issues, do not figure in the Commission’s refugee distribution plan, but would be free to participate on a voluntary basis.
British Prime Minister David Cameron announced this week that the UK will take in 20,000 Syrian refugees over the next five years; an effort many have criticised as far from sufficient. But Cameron insisted this was a sovereign UK decision, and had nothing to do with the Commission-proposed quota system of burden sharing.
>>Read: Cameron: UK refugee acceptance not imposed by Brussels
A number of EU countries are against the mandatory quotas, some of them saying that they cannot host large number of refugees. As a gesture to them, the Juncker plan foresees a “temporary solidarity clause” which allows the respective country to pay a sum to the EU budget, instead of receiving its share of refugees.
“If – for justified and objective reasons such as a natural disaster – a Member State cannot temporarily participate totally or in part in a relocation decision, it will have to make a financial contribution to the EU budget of an amount of 0.002% of its GDP”, the Juncker plan says.
The financial contribution is not heavy. EURACTIV has calculated that if Poland refuses to take refugees, the sum it would pay to the EU budget is of €10.5 million.
On top of the emergency distribution system, Jean-Claude Juncker also called for the establishment of a permanent relocation mechanism for refugees in Europe, which could be invoked in future crises. Such a system would allow the commission to bypass the Dublin Regulation without the need to reform it.
>>Read: Germany suspends Dublin agreement for Syrian refugees
Safe countries of origin
Another major change Juncker proposed in his the State of the Union speech was to review the list of countries officially recognised as ‘safe countries of origin’. This should allow the EU’s national asylum systems to deal with certain applications more quickly. “But that will not change the right to asylum for citizens of these countries,” the head of the executive said.
The Commission’s proposal lists the Balkan countries (Albania, Kosovo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia), where many of the refugees come from, as well as Turkey, as safe countries of origin. President Juncker said “Those countries that are removed from this list of safe countries will lose any chance of integration into the EU.”
Asylum applications from the citizens of these 7 countries account for around 17% of the total, according to the Commission, but only a very small percentage of these applications are valid. In 2014, only 3% of asylum applicants from Montenegro were eligible.
Commission Vice-President Frans Timmermans appealed to MEPs to back the proposals, in order to give the package the best possible chance of being adopted during the Home Affairs Council on 14 September.
The European Parliament will make its decision on 10 September in Brussels.
>>Read: Visegrad summit rejects migrant quotas
Supported by Germany and France, the Commission’s proposals will face hostility from eastern European countries and the United Kingdom, which has ruled out the idea of refugee quotas.
>>Read: Why Angela Merkel is so generous to the refugees
Legal channels
Beyond outlining the emergency measures he hopes member states will adopt, Jean-Claude Juncker also announced his intention to review the EU’s migration policy early next year, and to propose a package of reforms to legal channels of migration into the bloc.
“Migration should gradually stop being a problem to solve and become a well-managed opportunity,” he said.
In a speech in the Bundestag yesterday, Merkel welcomed the Juncker plan, adding that even more ambitious and binding agreements were needed.
>>Read: Merkel: Juncker’s refugee plan should be taken even further
