Commission’s lobbyists register to ‘serve as testing ground’

kallas4.jpg

The format of the EU executive’s voluntary lobbyists register to be published on 23 June is ‘not set in stone’ and can be adapted in future, said Siim Kallas, the Commission vice president in charge of administration and anti-fraud, on 28 May.

The European Commission “will work hard” towards developing a mandatory lobbyists register in conjunction with the European Parliament, Vice President Kallas told a conference organised by Commission trainees. 

Towards a common register? 

The June register “will serve as a testing ground for the feasibility of a common register” with the Parliament and Council, Kallas said. However, he warned that “there are 1,000 devils in the detail” regarding how this can be achieved in practice. 

At present, the three institutions have very different rules governing the behaviour of lobbyists and bringing these together into a ‘one-stop’ shop to cover the Commission, the Parliament and the Council will not be an easy task. 

In the Commission, national experts are often seconded from the member states to assist in the preparation of legislation, an area where Kallas himself admits “there is a lot of room for improvement”. 

In the Parliament, frequent visitors require an access badge, of which 5,000 have been granted, according to German Socialist MEP and chair of Parliament’s Constitutional Affairs Committee Jo Leinen, while a ‘legislative footprint’ requires MEPs to provide information regarding any outside assistance used in the preparation of legislation. 

As for the Council, which enjoys considerable power under the co-decision procedure, legislation is often prepared by experts or diplomats seconded from national administrations in the member states, clouding the issue still further. 

Should the register include the names of individuals? 

“We don’t need the names of individuals” in the lobbyists register, said Kallas. “It doesn’t matter whether it is John or Harry,” he explained, as it is more important to know which outside interests are being represented than people’s names. What’s more, the requirement that law firms participating in the register must list their clients is “a big step forward,” he added. 

But Leinen told the conference that the register should include names because issues such as whether former Commission officials were involved in the preparation of legislation are “important and interesting questions for the public”. 

Likewise, Brussels lobbying veteran and CEO of CLAN Public Affairs Daniel Guéguen said “giving the name of your client is not enough” as this makes it possible to “hide behind a smokescreen”. He said he is not against revealing the names of his own clients and indeed “would be proud to do so”. 

Should lawyers have to register? 

Parliament’s report suggests lawyers should register “when their purpose is to influence policy rather than case law”. But Guéguen said “there is no difference between a top lawyer and a top lobbyist”. 

For his part, Commissioner Kallas stressed that the EU executive “wants to limit lawyers’ exceptions”. Although “Parliament does not seem to expect lawyers to register,” they should only be excluded “in cases where it is crucial to protect a client’s rights”. 

But Leinen warned that when giving legal advice, lawyers are simply carrying out their profession. Instead, “the client approaching the institution should be [classed as] the lobbyist, not the lawyer” in such cases, and lawyers should only be treated as lobbyists “when they approach the institutions outright”. 

Financial disclosure 

Interest representatives intending to take part in Kallas’s register will have to declare how much funding they receive from each client to the nearest €50,000 euros – in bands of €0-49,000, €50,000-99,000, €100,000-149,000 and so on. Consultancies will be asked to declare the percentage of annual lobbying income received from a particular client in bands of 10% (EURACTIV 26/05/08). 

But Leinen urged for brackets of €10,000 to be used instead as “financial disclosure should be more precise,” while Guéguen warned that for consultancies and professional lobbying firms alike, more clarification is needed on the kind of activities to be included in the financial disclosure requirement. 

“I spend less that 5% of my time on active lobbying” while the rest is non-active such as giving lectures and writing books, Guéguen said, wondering whether these activities would also need to be declared. 

The debate now shifts to the work of the inter-institutional working group to be established by the Parliament report, which is set to present a proposal for a common register by the end of the year. 

Read more with Euractiv

Subscribe now to our newsletter EU Elections Decoded

Anti-Fraud and Administrative Affairs Commissioner Siim Kallas told the conference that "lobbying should not be a closed market" and stressed that "there is nothing wrong with lobbying". "You should still be able to meet Commission officials if you are not on the register," he added. 

Declaring his willingness to co-operate with the other institutions, Kallas stressed that "the creation of a lobbyists register by the Commission was supposed to be a common enterprise" when it was first proposed under the ETI in 2005. 

Kallas said the Commission's upcoming voluntary lobbyists register offers the profession "a time-limited chance to respect transparency" ahead of a decision on whether to press ahead with a common, mandatory one. 

Calls for the names of all individuals to be included in the register "disturb" the commissioner. "I am not the head of a criminal gang and transparency is not a witch hunt," he said. 

German Socialist MEP Jo Leinen, the chair of Parliament's Constitutional Affairs Committee, said "we are obliged to create a new culture of transparency ahead of the European Parliament elections in 2009". 

"Lobbying has many different forms," Leinen said, adding that although the new approach "will not catch everyone," "it should get the mainstream". Registration must be mandatory because "without a legislative act, the sanctions will be quite weak," he warned. 

He called for the Commission's upcoming register to contain individual names followed by the company in brackets, stating: "Kallas may start with no names, but in the Parliament we want names so he will need [names] too if he wants a common register". 

Brussels lobbying veteran Daniel Guéguen, the CEO of CLAN Public Affairs, executive chairman of the European Training Institute and self-styled "survivor of the EU jungle," said both his profession and the Commission must be "totally transparent" if there is to be a "win-win situation". 

Calling for inclusion in any register to be mandatory, he described the non-compulsory register about to be launched by the Commission as "useless". Moreover, he said co-operation between the profession and the EU executive "is not good enough," accusing lobbyists of being "too defensive". 

On financial disclosure, he said CLAN Public Affairs is "a limited company so you can see our accounts anyway". 

Representing the Society of European Affairs Professionals (SEAP), a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales said "the last thing we want is more regulation or another regulatory body". 

Paul de Clerck of Friends of the Earth Europe, a member of the steering committee of the Alliance for Lobbying Transparency and Ethics Regulation (ALTER-EU), called for the establishment of "a mandatory database for individual lobbyists," stating that "the US, Canada and Australia have lobby registers with names". 

He also said "financial disclosure needs to be much more precise". 

Tom Antonissen of LOGOS Public Affairs, of which one of the partners, José Lalloum, is currently chairing EPACA, complained that "registering at the European Parliament is already difficult enough" and asked Leinen "not to make it more difficult". 

Administration and Anti-Fraud Commissioner Siim Kallas was speaking at a conference entitled 'Lobbying and the European Union Governance System: The Future Perspectives' organised by trainees of the European Commission on 28 May 2008. 

The Commission is planning to introduce a voluntary lobbyists' register and a code of conduct for interest representatives on 23 June 2008 as part of the wider transparency initiative launched by Commissioner Kallas in 2005 (EURACTIV 09/05/08). 

Yesterday's event brought representatives of the European Parliament, NGOs and professional lobbying firms together with the commissioner to debate the issues surrounding the register. 

Meanwhile, a landmark lobbying report adopted in Parliament on 8 May 2008 calls for the creation of a mandatory public register common to all three institutions, providing for "full financial disclosure" and accompanied by a code of conduct complete with a mechanism for expelling lobbyists who infringe its rules. 

  • 23 June 2008: Commission to launch its own voluntary lobbyists register. 
  • By end 2008: Inter-institutional working group to present proposal for a common lobbyists register. 

Subscribe to our newsletters

Subscribe