Est. 4min 24-08-2010 (updated: 07-11-2012 ) Jobs__198__isp.png Euractiv is part of the Trust Project >>> Languages: Français | DeutschPrint Email Facebook X LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram The future of the EU's cohesion policy – which is currently being discussed in Brussels – is likely to divide member states, as some are said to be pushing for the re-nationalisation of European pro-employment funding while others are fighting for the status quo to be maintained in years to come. Governments are primarily divided over the future of the European Social Fund (ESF), which distributes EU money across the bloc to boost European employment. Amid an ongoing economic crisis and with unemployment rates at a peak in recent years, some of the fund's biggest financial backers, particularly the big member states, are said to be proposing a sort of re-nationalisation of these resources for the period covering the next EU financial framework, from 2014 to 2020. The idea has been circulating in EU circles in recent months, although no concrete proposals have been tabled. The possibility of reviewing such a key financial resource has triggered strong criticism from Eastern European member states, which are among the main beneficiaries of the funds. Last week, the leaders of the four Visegrad countries (Poland, Hungary, Slovakia and the Czech Republic) sent a letter to the president of the European Commission, José Manuel Barroso. They called for the ESF to remain within the scope of EU cohesion policy, reported EURACTIV Germany. Warning from regional authorities Their call follows warnings issued in July by Michèle Sabban, president of the Assembly of European Regions (AER), a body which gathers regions across 33 European countries. Regional authorities are the main controllers of ESF money. "We recently learned that the European Commission plans to remove the European Social Fund from the domain of cohesion policy in order to finance a new European Union strategy for employment," reads an open letter from Sabban. "The AER will remain vigilant concerning threats of re-nationalisation and sectoralisation of the cohesion policy," she added. AER spokesperson Francine Huhardeaux yesterday confirmed to EURACTIV that the AER remains concerned about Brussels' intentions and reiterated that the "sectorisation and nationalisation of the fund will hinder the coherence and effectiveness of the overall policy". The first appeal to avoid a possible shift in current policy was issued by former EU Regional Policy Commissioner Danuta Hubner. The Polish politician, in her current role as chair of the European Parliament's committee on regional development, warned at the beginning of July "about separation of the European Social Fund from cohesion policy". This could affect the European added value of the fund, she said. Commission tries to calm down debate "We have no intention at the moment to get rid of the European Social Fund," European Commission spokesperson Olivier Bailly said yesterday in Brussels, acknowledging nevertheless that "there are reflections about the structure of the budget for 2013 and beyond". In a speech given in June, EU Social Affairs and Employment Commissioner Làszlò Andor conceded that the ESF "will need to evolve and adapt". "The future ESF should be fully aligned in all member states with the Europe 2020 strategy and the integrated guidelines. This will increase the relevance of the fund as a policy instrument," he said, opening the door for debate over a new role of the fund, whether within EU cohesion policy or outside of it. Andor's spokesperson made clear to EURACTIV that "there are no plans to remove the ESF from cohesion policy," before stressing the need for a better focus of the fund, which should be "more aligned" with the EU's overall priorities. The Commission will launch an official debate on the issue in the coming weeks, ahead of the already heated general debate over the allocation of EU funds until 2020. Read more with Euractiv Give Commission more regional budget clout, says Tallinn mayor The EU's large regional policy budget should be kept at its current level, but only if the European Commission gets a bigger say on how funding is allocated and to which regions, Tallinn Mayor Edgar Savisaar told EURACTIV in an interview, lamenting a lack of coherence in the distribution of structural and cohesion funds. Subscribe now to our newsletter EU Elections Decoded Email Address * Politics Newsletters Positions In a July letter to European Commission President José Manuel Barroso obtained by EURACTIV, the president of the European People's Party group in the Committee of the Regions, Dr. Michael Schneider, expressed his opposition to the possible separation of the European Social Fund from the EU's other cohesion policy instruments – particularly the European Regional Development Fund. ''Taking into consideration the importance of the future financial perspectives, we believe that the voice of regions and cities on the future of financing means for cohesion policy has to be heard. Indeed, promoting jobs and growth is not the exclusive task of central governments and we have to ensure that the European, national, regional and local levels are involved in a permanent dialogue,'' he wrote. ''Moreover, because regions and cities are among the biggest beneficiaries of structural funds, we believe that the ESF has proven its worth in the success of cohesion policy,'' he added. ''Therefore we think that decoupling ESF from cohesion policy would be heading in the wrong direction. Through close connection with ERDF interventions, the investment in training and retraining through the ESF can lead to new jobs and lasting employment,'' said Schneider, the CoR's rapporteur on the cohesion policy instruments to be used for the implementation of Europe 2020. In another letter, also sent to President Barroso in July, Jozias van Aartsen, mayor of The Hague and president of city lobby EUROCITIES, said "the forthcoming budget review risks intensifying the 'sectoralisation' of European funding. Europe has a new objective, enshrined in the Lisbon Treaty, of territorial cohesion, namely to realise the potential of all the diverse areas of the EU". "Progress on this front will be impeded unless we retain a strong territorial dimension in the budget," he said. Van Aartsen concluded: "It is therefore essential that the sectoral streams of Europe 2020 each include a territorial aspect. It is equally imperative that cohesion policy remains a key component of the future EU budget, and with the capacity to combine various financial instruments (e.g. ESF, ERDF, and the Rural Development Fund) in order to support an integrated approach to local development on the ground. Separating ESF from the structural funds would undermine an integrated approach and territorial cohesion." Background The European Social Fund (ESF) is one of the European regional funding mechanisms, which aim to reduce economic and social differences across the EU. The specific objective of the ESF is to promote employment and social inclusion throughout all the regions of the European Union. For the period 2007-2013, the European Union committed around 75 billion euro to the ESF, almost 8% of the EU budget for the current seven-year financial cycle. The other regional funds are the European Regional Development Fund and the Cohesion Fund. The financial resources of the funds have been mostly channelled to EU citizens via the regions. As featured in regular news stories on EURACTIV’s Regional Policy section, the debate on how the post-2013 regional (or cohesion) policy should evolve is currently intensifying in Brussels and beyond. Timeline Further ReadingEuropean Union European Commission:Andor’s speech on ESF – 24 June 2010 European Commission:ESF official webpage European Parliament: Hubner’s warning about ESF – 1 July 2010 Committee of the Regions:Letter on ESF - EPP CoR President to Barroso(16 July 2010) EU Actors positions Assembly of the European Regions Open letter to Barroso on ESF – 12 July 2010 Speeches EURACTIV Slovakia: Budúcnos? kohéznej politiky vyvoláva napätie v EÚ Press articles EURACTIV Germany:Visegrad countries’ call on ESF – 23 August 2010 EURACTIV Hungary:Nem törlik el az Európai Szociális Alapot EURACTIV Czech Republic:?R s vy?le?ováním ESF z budoucí politiky soudržnosti nesouhlasí