Aircraft emissions to be debated under UK Presidency

Several options are being considered to reduce the growing
global warming impact of aeroplanes. Proposals will be unveiled
under the UK Presidency, after impact assessments are made on the
economy, jobs and the environment.

The highly politically charged debate on how to tackle the
global warming impact of aviation will be launched under the UK
Presidency, according to Roberto Salvarani, head of Environment and
Safety Unit at the Commission’s Transport directorate.

Several options are being assessed to reduce the global warming
impact of the aviation sector:

  • Incorporating aviation in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU
    ETS). This implies including nitrogen oxide (NOx) into the scheme
    which currently only covers CO2. CO2 emissions from the
    aviation sector are actually quite low in the EU (about 2% of total
    human induced emissions). The bulk of the global warming impact of
    aviation in fact comes from NOx, which causes ozone formation,
    especially at high altitudes.
  • A charging system based on the quantities burned (unit
    cost)
  • A tax on kerosene (fixed price)

Other, less radical measures are being given equal
attention:

  • Reducing flight routes thanks to better air control and
    operation systems
  • Increasing the fuel efficiency of aircraft

Questions remain as to the feasibility of integrating aircraft
emissions in time for the second phase of the EU ETS in 2008. Such
a project would require the approval of both the Council and
Parliament, a procedure which can take several years if it is not
backed up by a strong political consensus in both institutions.

Read more with Euractiv

Subscribe now to our newsletter EU Elections Decoded

A study for the Commission by the Dutch consulting
and research organisation CE Delft
explored the policy
options to reduce the global warming impact of aviation. CE Delft's
Ron Wit said CO2 emissions from the air transport sector were
expected to grow by 110% between 2002 and 2025. Emissions of
Nitrogen oxide (NOx) are to grow by 60% over the same period.
According to Wit, political solutions need to take account of:

  • Competition issues between EU and non-EU airlines
  • Scope of measures (route-based or inside the EU airspace
    only)
  • Monitoring emissions and the 'currency' chosen to measure
    climate impact as well as the associated measures to curb
    emissions

According to the study, the cost effectiveness of a charging
system or an emissions trading system are similar. But Wit said
that a tax on kerosene would be faced with legal obstacles related
to the inclusion of non-EU companies. The answer, he argued, "is
based on political arguments" such as a global emissions trading
scheme.

Roberto Salvarani, head of the Environment and Safety Unit at
the Commission's Transport directorate,
warned that new measures to tackle the global warming impact
of aviation were likely to weigh heavily on industry and
consumers. Measures, he said, "will affect the competitiveness of
the EU industry unless they are applied on a global scale". The EU,
he said, is "a pioneer" in tackling climate change. However, he
hoped the EU would not "confuse bravery with naivety" by taking
measures without previous impact assessment on jobs and
competitiveness. 

Speaking to EURACTIV, he said the Commission will publish a
communication on the topic, probably in July or September, under
the UK Presidency. The communication will revisit three
instruments: aviation fuel taxes, emissions charges and inclusion
in ETS. A Commission   roadmap document indicates that the communication is
likely to suggest a combination of measures, taking particular
account of ease of implementation when examining options. The
proposed measures will be agreed between the directorates
responsible for transport, environment and taxation, Salvarani
indicated.

Salvarani further pointed to a number of possible other measures
aimed at optimising energy consumption in the aviation sector:

  • Update aircraft fuel efficiency (although future savings will
    be lower than those already achieved)
  • Optimise air traffic management thanks to the Galileo satellite
    navigation system
  • Reduce airport energy consumption with existing measures on
    energy efficiency of buildings
  • Make increased usage of alternative fuels to reduce aircraft
    emissions

"My Commissioner [Jacques Barrot] has a complete open mind" on
the range of options available, Salvarani told the seminar.

The Association of European Airlines (AEA
- which includes the likes of British Airways and Air France) said
in a press briefing a year ago that an emissions trading scheme
would be "the most effective mechanism to allow aviation industry
to reduce its CO2 impact". The AEA said it was "committed to
promote such a scheme". But the AEA is opposed to the introduction
of a tax on Kerosene or to taxes on EU flights on the basis that
they would lead to distortions of competition between EU and non-EU
airlines.
In a   letter sent to the Financial Times, the
director of the European Association for Transport and
the Environment
(T&E), Jos Dings, said that "airlines
are wrong to say emissions trading is the only way to combat the
impact of aviation on the environment". Dings suggests "en-route
emissions charges and tax on aviation fuel" as two
examples that would "bring the sector into line with every other
area of economic activity".

In a resolution, the Parliament expressed
itself in favour of "incorporating emissions from international
flights and shipping into the emission reduction targets of the
second commitment period" of the Kyoto Protocol (2008-2012).

A seminar on "Tackling the global warming impact of aviation"
was organised in the European Parliament on 31 January. The seminar
was organised by the European Federation for Transport and the
Environment, Milieudefensie (Friends of the Earth Netherlands) the
Aviation Environment Federation and hosted by   Chris Davies MEP (UK, ALDE).

The seminar took place after Prime Minister Tony Blair pledged
to seek a breakthrough on climate change when he takes the EU
Presidency in the second half of this year (see EURACTIV, 27 Jan. 2005).

A Commission communication on reducing the climate change impact
of aviation will be published in July or September 2005.

Subscribe to our newsletters

Subscribe