China defends its handling of rare earths against EU charges

rare earth tantalum_1.jpg

China denied today (20 June) that it interferes with prices on the global rare earths market amid a trade dispute with the EU other major economies, saying product quality variations account for the price gap between the metals it produces for export and domestic use.

In March, the European Union, United States and Japan complained to the World Trade Organization that Beijing, which has a monopoly over world supplies of the mineral, illegally choked exports while holding down prices for domestic manufacturers.

Su Bo, a senior official at China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, said that higher quality demands by foreign firms and customs costs – not a decree from Beijing – partly explained the steeper prices paid by foreign companies.

"It's like an article of clothing. It could cost 10,000 yuan or 1,000 yuan, depending on the product quality," Su said, citing industry experts.

Still, Su stopped short of a full explanation for the price difference that has upset trading partners.

"We need to search for an answer, because our government has never interfered with market prices," he told a press briefing.

Rare earths are key elements in producing modern technologies from iPhones and disk drives to wind turbines, as well as components for the defence industry.

China, which accounts for about 97% of world output of the 17 rare earth metals, imposes strict export quotas in what it says is an effort to curtail environmental pollution and resource exhaustion.

In a similar case on raw materials in January the WTO ruled against China, saying that environmental protection is only a valid reason to curtail exports if China is giving the domestic and international markets equal treatment.

Refining rare earths requires large amounts of acid, and also produces low-level radioactive waste. Beijing is quick to note that other countries, notably the United States, have closed their own rare earths refineries, citing pollution concerns.

"The Chinese people believe, after years of supplying so much of the world's rare earths, that we deserve some appreciation," Su said.

Despite a 30,184 tonne export quota in 2011, China says it shipped only 18,600 tonnes last year. The squeeze on supply has led, in part, to a fourfold increase in export prices over the past two years.

The government has said the quota will remain steady in 2012.

As a result of the curbs, the European Union has said foreign firms pay up to twice as much as Chinese firms for rare earth metals.

Ministry official Jia Yinsong, said excessive extraction was leading to a depletion of China's rare earth reserves. He said China held 23% of known reserves, not the 36% that the United States has cited for China. 


In 2010, an EU expert group identified 14 raw materials as "critical" for EU high-tech and eco-industries, which included rare earths among others.

Of the 41 minerals and metals analysed, the group listed the following as critical for the EU: antimony, beryllium, cobalt, fluorspar, gallium, germanium, graphite, indium, magnesium, niobium, PGMs (Platinum Group Metals), rare earths, tantalum and tungsten.

The group suggested that the European Union's global diplomacy should be geared up to ensure that companies gain easier access to them in future.

The move was part of the European Commission's 'integrated strategy' for raw materials, presented in November 2008 (see our LinksDossier on raw materials).