German industry federation BDI has been forced to slash its estimate of the economic benefits for Europe of a proposed US-EU free trade pact by a factor of 10, it conceded Wednesday (11 March).
The BDI had said online that the controversial trade deal would spell an economic boost of about 100 billion euros a year for the EU – roughly the economic benefit other experts forecast over a decade.
Following repeated questioning by Foodwatch, a non-government group, the BDI drastically revised down the estimates published on its website on the positive effect of a Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, or TTIP.
“It is correct that our communication may have given the impression that an annual boost to the economy of 100 billion euros could be expected,” the BDI’s TTIP expert, Stormy-Annika Mildner, wrote in a letter to Foodwatch chief Thilo Bode.
BDI had “immediately corrected” the corresponding passage on its homepage and added additional explanations, Mildner wrote.
But it was “in no way … a conscious campaign of false or misinformation,” BDI insisted in the letter, a copy of which was obtained by AFP.
Foodwatch had accused BDI of purveying “grossly false information” about the trade pact.
According to an estimate drawn up by the Centre for Economic Policy Research for the European Commission, the TTIP agreement will boost the EU’s combined gross domestic product by 0.5% 10 years after its implementation.
In concrete terms, that amounts to some 119 billion euros by 2027.
BDI is one of the most fervent supporters of TTIP in Germany.
Chancellor Angela Merkel said last week that she favours a conclusion of the free trade agreement this year, in the interests of “jobs and growth in Europe”.
But within the center-left Social Democratic Party, which shares power with Merkel’s conservative Christian Democratic Union in the coalition government, support for TTIP is much more tepid.
Germany is one of the countries where popular resistance to the deal is strongest, the EU’s trade commissioner Cecilia Malmström recently conceded.
Campaigners in Europe are convinced that powerful interests are selling the consumer short in the secret negotiations.
The EU-US trade deal would not just slash the already low trade tariffs they share, but would also harmonise regulations to an unprecedented degree, affecting goods and services as far-ranging as Roquefort cheese and accounting.
But campaigners are opposed to many aspects. The most contentious part of the deal is a clause which would allow corporations to sue governments in tribunals that are above national law.
Negotiations between the United States and the European Union on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership began in July 2013.
The guidelines stated that the EU should seek to include provisions on investment protection and investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) in the proposed agreement.
If the treaty is signed, it will affect almost 40% of world GDP. The transatlantic market is already the most important in the world, with €2 billion of goods and services exchanged every day.
The deal could save companies millions of euros and create hundreds of thousands of new jobs on both sides of the Atlantic. The average European household could save €545 per year and European GDP could increase by nearly 0.5%, according to official estimates.
Brussels and Washington want to conclude the ambitious negotiations and seal the deal by the end of 2015.
>> Read our LinksDossier: TTIP for dummies