As 771 European cities prepare to launch the 2006 European Mobility week, Stockholm’s inhabitants must vote on a system of road tolls aimed at reducing traffic in the city centre.
With around 80% of European citizens living in urban areas, simply getting from one place to another is becoming an ordeal because cars are causing so much congestion. In some towns, the average driving speed during rush hour is slower than horse-and-cart days.
Increased car use is also accompanied by safety, health and environmental problems. For instance, air pollution is at the root of an increasing number of respiratory problems such as asthma, with an estimated 300,000 people dying prematurely each year from air pollution related diseases.
To counter this evolution, a number of European cities have taken the initiative to develop traffic-control systems, in order to encourage a modal shift from private to public transport.
After Rome, London, Edinburgh and Oslo, Stockholm is the latest city to test a traffic-management system. The difference in Sweden is that, rather than imposing new measures as was done in 2003 in London, Stockholm will actually allow its citizens to vote on the matter in a referendum, which will take place on 17 September 2006, following a seven-month trial period.
During the trial, drivers were charged between €1 and €2.10, according to the time of the day, each time they entered exited the city centre congestion zone on weekdays between 6:30 am and 6:29 pm – up to a maximum fee of €6.5 per day. Some vehicles were exempt, including taxis, motorcycles and environmentally-friendly cars such as hybrid or ethanol-fuelled cars. As in London, cars did not have to stop when crossing the cordon as the system was controlled via cameras located at toll points that photograph cars’ license plates.
The aim was to reduce traffic by 10-15% and provide more resources for public transport. Despite polls showing that around 70% of Stockholm’s inhabitants opposed the congestion charges, Sweden’s Social-Democrat-led government went ahead with the trial as of 1 January 2006 after it was approved by the national parliament. The trial period ended on 31 July 2006 and, according to a final report from Stockholm’s city congestion charge department, the effects on the traffic over the period were much bigger than expected:
- Traffic passing over the congestion zone boundaries decreased by nearly a quarter (22%);
- Traffic accidents involving injuries fell by 5-10%;
- Carbon dioxide emissions were reduced by 14% in the inner city and by 2-3% overall in Stockholm County, just as a result of this one policy, and;
- Public transport use increased by about 6% (although around 1.5% of that is credited to higher fuel prices during the period).
Furthermore, as people started experiencing all these effects directly, opposition to introducing the congestion charge on a permanent basis waned. Latest polls show that over 50% of Stockholmers plan to vote in favour of the fees in the 17 September referendum.
The result of the referendum could influence the pick-up of such traffic-control systems in other European cities.
If Stockholm’s residents vote in favour of the plan, it would show leaders that citizens actually support such measures. But, if they vote against the plan, it could set back efforts to introduce congestion charging elsewhere. Indeed, Sweden’s citizens are largely environmentally-friendly and the country has a good public transport system. If congestion pricing isn’t accepted there, it is unlikely it will be accepted in other countries.