Est. 3min 28-05-2008 (updated: 28-05-2012 ) biofuels_01.jpg Euractiv is part of the Trust Project >>> Languages: Français | DeutschPrint Email Facebook X LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram The pressure is rising on the Commission to water down plans to raise the share of biofuels in transport to 10% by 2020, as leading MEPs on the issue call for the target to be cut to 8% or scrapped entirely. “Given the many unknowns today, the responsible way to go forward seems to be to reverse the decision about the 10% renewable target and, instead, go for a lower target – like 8%,” states the report drafted by Swedish MEP Anders Wijkman for Parliament’s environment committee. His report conflicts slightly with the one published last week for the industry committee by the leading MEP on the issue, German Green Claude Turmes. Indeed, the Turmes report goes even further by completely scrapping biofuels from the EU agenda (EURACTIV 13/05/08). The Turmes report justifies the rejection of biofuel mandates by saying: “Heads of state and government put specific preconditions to be fulfilled, i.e. a) the production must be sustainable and b) second generation must be commercially available. Since March 2007, evidence is growing that these conditions will not be fulfilled. The 10% target must therefore be abandoned.” Nevertheless, speaking at a joint briefing with Wijkman in Parliament on 27 May, Turmes signalled that, while he believes it is “too early” to set any form of target, he could shift on the issue. Turmes further added that Energy Commissioner Andris Piebalgs had assured him that he would “not stand in the way” if he succeeds in clinching a deal with member states on reducing the target. According to Turmes, while France and Poland have tried to rush through the 10% target, Germany, the UK and the Netherlands are more sceptical. Another 15 countries have no clear position and are “hiding behind” the Commission, he said, adding that he would be upping the pressure on the EU executive to change its stance on the 10%. Wijkman wants the 8% target to be combined with a requirement for all biofuels which count towards the target to achieve greenhouse gas savings of at least 50% compared to conventional fuels – which is higher than the 35% proposed by the Commission. “We need a target for investors”, he said. The reports should be voted upon in committees in July, while the full plenary is due to express its position on 23 September. It remains unclear if a majority of MEPs would stand behind a scrapping of the biofuels target (see positions). Read more with Euractiv MEPs reject watered-down airline emission targets MEPs have declared a de facto war against national governments by maintaining their demands for strict emission reduction targets for Europe's rapidly growing aviation sector, despite ministers' insistence on a more industry-friendly approach. Subscribe now to our newsletter EU Elections Decoded Email Address * Politics Newsletters PositionsIn a recent press release, the European Commission concedes that "the target has never been to reach 10% biofuels at any price. It is 10% biofuels under strict conditions. Those conditions include a workable and robust sustainability scheme, and commercial viability for second generation biofuels." However, it underlines that an EU sustainability scheme, which will ensure that production does not have damaging side-effects, is currently under discussion and that it would be to Europe's advantage to promote such a scheme internationally (EURACTIV 01/04/08). "With or without the Union's 10% target, there will be a further increase in the worldwide production of biofuels. Europe can best make a contribution by doing everything possible to show that a sustainability scheme can work and to ensure a rapid transition to the new generation of biofuels. In the transport sector today, the only alternative to non-sustainable fossil fuel is biofuel," it stressed. In a 28 May debate on the Turmes report, a number of MEPs in the Parliament's Industry (ITRE) Committee indicated that they were hesitant to scrap the biofuels target entirely. German Christian Democrat MEP Werner Langen called for an "open discussion" on the issue, stressing the need for robust sustainability criteria. Danish Socialist MEP Britta Thomsen, Dutch Socialist MEP Dorbette Corbey and UK Liberal MEP Fiona Hall argued that the 10% target should be kept, but that the Commission should tighten its sustainability criteria while broadening their scope to water use, biodiversity impacts, social criteria and land use changes. According to Hall and Corbey, these should be acompanied by more regular monitoring of the impact of agro-fuel crop cultivation, particularly on food prices. Biofuel producers are alarmed at the prospect of Europe retreating on its commitments, with European Bioethanol Fuel Association (eBio) Secretary General Rob Vierhout lamenting the fact that the debate has become "so emotional and irrational". He cautioned against dropping the 10% target, saying this would simply shift the EU away from biofuel use while countries like the US and Brazil, which do not necessarily produce to the standards envisaged by the EU in its sustainability criteria, continue their production. "There is no point in singling out biofuels as the source of all evil. Stopping biofuels would only have a very marginal impact on food prices," he told EURACTIV, adding that existing scientific assessments show the 10% target to be "absolutely manageable" without unsustainable pressure being put on soil, water and biodiversity, even if it is entirely based on domestic production. Farmers' associations are also angered by Parliament's plans, with Copa-Cogeca insisting that "the binding minimum objective of 10% for biofuels in transport must be maintained". UK National Farmers' Union Vice-President Paul Temple adds that biofuels are the only practical solution to replacing a diminishing supply of fossil fuels and that targets are vital to reduce transport emissions. Furthermore, biofuel technology, including second generation biofuels, can only progress with investment, which in turn requires long-term targets, he stressed. "Simple, comprehensible targets like this will help to give companies the confidence to deliver advanced biofuels," he said. "Removing the 10% target means the EU would hold no sway over the sustainability standards of the fast-developing international market in biofuels and bioenergy, or any sustainability criteria for other agricultural commodities which may follow," he added. While campaigners from a range of Europe-wide NGOs welcomed the proposals to scrap the target, they rejected the Wijkman proposals for an 8% target. In a press release issued on 28 May, Nina Holland from Corporate Europe Observatory said: "An 8% target will cause almost as much damage as a 10% target. Pushing up food prices is causing hunger and that fact is inescapable. The EU's targets should be dropped." Ariel Brunner, EU Agriculture Policy Officer for BirdLife International, agrees: "It is time for the biofuels target to be set aside and for fresh thinking on how to really tackle climate change while preserving natural habitats." Background In March 2007, EU leaders committed to raising the share of biofuels in transport from current levels of around 2% to 10% by 2020, following growing concerns over rising oil prices, energy security and climate change. The goal was then translated into legal proposals, presented on 23 January 2008 by the Commission, as part of a broader Directive on renewable energies. The draft directive introduces a range of "sustainability criteria" for biofuels to counter growing concerns about the risks related to their mass production, including deforestation, hikes in food prices and water shortages. Timeline 16 Jul. 2008: Industry and Energy Committee scheduled to vote on Turmes report. 23 Sep. 2008: Plenary scheduled to vote on the report. Further ReadingEU official documents European Parliament:Legislative tracker on the Renewable Energy Directive [FR] European Parliament:Turmes report on the Renewable Energy Directive(13 May 2008) [FR] [FR] [DE] Business & Industry European Renewable Energy couuncil (EREC):Turmes Report on the Renewable Energy Framework Directive - EREC Position(28 May 2008) Copa-Cogeca:The binding minimum objective of 10% for biofuels in transport must be maintained(27 May 2008) NGOs and Think-Tanks Corporate Europe Observatory, Biofuelwatch, et al.:MEP report calls for 10% biofuel target to be scrapped(28 May 2008)