SNP Brexit minister: There is no such thing as a UK ‘single market’

Michael Russell, Brexit Minister for the Scottish National Party. Russell was in Brussels when Nicola Sturgeon announced plans for a second independence referendum for Scotland. [Scott Arthur/YouTube]

On the day Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon announced a new referendum on independence, quizzed the SNP’s Brexit minister in Brussels on whether Scotland could actually rejoin the EU and why pro-independence polls hadn’t budged since the Brexit vote in June.

Michael Russell is a Scottish National Party (SNP) politician who is the Minister for UK Negotiations on Scotland’s Place in Europe.

Russell was interviewed by Matthew Tempest.

One thing I don’t understand about Nicola Sturgeon’s announcement is the timing. Won’t the UK’s Brexit negotiations still be ongoing [in the time frame of autumn 2018-spring 2019 suggested]?

No, the intention is to give people a choice, when there is a clear choice to be had.

So, the timing that Nicola quite clearly announced is that at the end of that process, which has already been defined by the two years of the Article 50 process, there has been constant reference to the fact that there will be eighteen months of negotiation and six months of ratification. At some stage in that period, she’s indicated, it would be the right time to have an informed choice  – and she used the words “informed choice”. There will be an outcome sufficient for the European Parliament to vote on, of course, because it will be voting on it, and an independence offering, which we will bring forward.

Scotland seeks second referendum amid Brexit doubts

The Scottish government announced today (13 March) a new independence vote, pre-empting this week’s expected start of the Brexit process. Nicola Sturgeon will seek the power to call a new referendum on whether Scotland should follow the UK out of the EU or form its own country.

But isn’t that ‘informed choice’ the Scottish voters will have, between possibly trying to rejoin the EU’s single market, and definitely leaving the ‘single market’ of the United Kingdom?

Well, we have to wait and see what that time scale gives us. But the reality of the situation – if I can just correct you – is there isn’t a ‘single market’ of the United Kingdom. That is a construct which the UK has put into the debate over the past few months, I dispute that term. There is a ‘unitary market’ of the United Kingdom. The ‘single market’ is something quite different. And that term has emerged as something which is used to argue against further devolution of powers.

I think there will be an absolute clarity in choice. And the clarity in choice will be between a definite leaving of the EU (which will be what the UK is offering, because that what the UK intends to do), and the European future for Scotland, which we have said will be membership of the EU, and that is the choice that will exist.

But the unionist side would call it a leap into the dark, because Scotland would be leaving the United Kingdom, but not certainly returning or rejoining the EU…

The certainty of leaving Europe is going with the UK. That is a certainty.

But Spain, or even other countries, may try to block you rejoining the EU?

Well, we’re 18 months away from that.

The certainty of leaving the EU is if we remain within the UK. That is the certainty, and we’ve made it very clear, so the choice has to be for the Scottish people, who’ve made it very clear already once in a referendum that they don’t want to do that [leave the EU], decisively. They must have that choice.

Catalonia independence leader banned from public office

The former head of Spain’s Catalonia region was barred from public office for two years earlier today (13 March) for staging an informal referendum on independence in 2014 at a time when secessionist leaders are trying to drum up support for a fresh ballot.

Is it not the case that the opinion polls are the ‘dog that didn’t bark’? In the sense that – despite the threat of Brexit – there hasn’t been much movement since 2014, either your way or the other way, it’s still roughly 45% vs 55%?

Nicola indicated that the two last referendum polls of significance are 2014 and 2016. The very significant thing now is the debate that takes place over the next eighteen months. And that is where the decision will be made.

And it will have to be an informed debate. We [the SNP] brought forward very substantial information in 2014, the UK government brought forward nothing, essentially, in 2016, nor did the Leave campaign.

There will be an informed debate, and it will be an informed choice.

But you’re an SNP politician, presumably a believer in independence all your life. Surely if the Scottish people vote ‘No’ twice in five years, that would be the end of independence?

I don’t go into a campaign without intending to win it. I don’t speculate about the outcome of campaigns, except to win those campaigns. That’s what politicians do.

But I have been involved – deeply – in the negotiations for the last six months with the UK, and I think the lack of progress in those dictates an absolute necessity.

Because we put forward a compromise, and that compromise has not been responded to in anything like the way it should have been by the UK. This is the right thing to do, to offer that choice.

Aren’t a lot of the open, or unanswered, questions from 2014 still there, though? Putting aside Brexit for a second, there is the Queen, the currency, NATO…

There was no issue about the Queen. That was resolved, if you read the White Paper, there was absolute clarity having the Queen as head of state.

But we will bring forward that details prospectus. This isn’t the day to bring forward a detailed prospectus. We have a track record of doing hard work, producing detailed prospectives. I would refer you to Scotland’s Place in Europe, which is the most detailed document on this matter I think that any part of the UK has authored.

We’ll bring forward a details prospectus and that will give a fair and informed choice.

A final question: There is a ‘conspiracy theory’ that Nicola Sturgeon doesn’t actually want the referendum. What she wants is Theresa May to turn down having a referendum, and therefore give you another groundswell of support?

There are endless conspiracy theories in politics. It’s fair to say anytime anything happens, there’s a new conspiracy theory.

I think this is absolutely clear and transparent. We did not want a referendum on Europe, we thought the outcome was quite clear in Scotland, and we wanted that to be observed, we anticipated that in our manifesto – the one I stood on – last year, and said ‘if this [Brexit], happened…’ – but even so, we then worked very hard indeed to try to make sure there was a compromise.

We have not had a reciprocal gesture from the UK. Therefore it is right, both given the mandate [in the 2016 Scottish Parliament election], and the referendum result, and what has happened in the last six months, that we have an informed choice – but only when we know what the outcome of the UK Brexit negotiations are, in terms of what will be the final deal. We will put that against another choice because there is no status quo.

The one certainty in this is that if we do nothing, we will be leaving the EU, and we think the people of Scotland should have a choice between those futures.

Scottish nationalists treat politics like a game, says May

The Scottish National Party is treating politics as a game and obsessing over independence rather than focusing on improving public services in Scotland, UK Prime Minister Theresa May will say today (3 March).

Juncker dangles prospect that Brexit Britain will ‘re-enter the boat’

European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker held out a lifeline that a post-Brexit Britain might one day want to rejoin the EU, at the close of a two-day European summit where, for once, it was the Polish not the British who were in a minority of one.

Subscribe to our newsletters