Climate policy could be ‘collateral damage’ of UK exit from EU

Fears are growing in Brussels that climate policy could become a political football in any referendum on EU membership, following British Prime Minister David Cameron’s declaration of intent yesterday (23 January) to hold an in/out poll.

graphic copy 500.jpg

Arthur Neslen Euractiv 24-01-2013 07:53 5 min. read Content type: Euractiv is part of the Trust Project

Fears are growing in Brussels that climate policy could become a political football in any referendum on EU membership, following British Prime Minister David Cameron’s declaration of intent yesterday (23 January) to hold an in/out poll.

The UK Independent Party (UKIP), which has links to the eurosceptic right of Cameron’s Conservatives, launched a petition on 21 January calling for the EU’s climate and energy targets to be suspended.

The petition’s professed objectives – to prevent carbon leakage, stop ‘wasting money’ on unilateral climate measures, reduce energy prices and increase energy security by allowing more fossil fuel use – are widely shared on the Conservative right and among Europe’s energy-intensive industries. 

>> Read: Industry claims EU climate laws are squashing recovery

UKIP's initiative may not reach the million signatures needed to activate EU policy-making processes, but it has set alarms ringing that climate change could enter the UK’s Europe debate by the backdoor.

“I don’t believe that environmental legislation is high among David Cameron’s concerns about the EU, but certainly it could be a victim of collateral damage if the UK were to pull out [of the EU],” said Graham Watson, a Liberal Democrat MEP.

“There is certainly an agenda, which has infected sections of the Conservative party, that argues we should ignore the climate and just continue to make money hand over fist,” Watson said. “Those arguing for our withdrawal from the EU tend also to be those who wish to build on the fossil fuel economy rather than making the green energy switch.” 

Tom Spencer, a veteran ex-Conservative MEP, agreed that climate change policy would be “one of the victims” of the disruption accompanying a UK withdrawal from Europe.

But environmentalists in Brussels could also be among the losers if Britain checks out at the Brussels door.  

Firm climate line

The UK has historically taken a firmer line on climate policy than some other EU states for reasons ranging from the scientific quality of its Met Office, to the destruction of its coal industry in the 1980s.

Although London has weakened proposed EU legislation on Arctic drilling and tar sands, it has also pushed for stronger carbon dioxide emissions reductions targets and from 1 April, will be implementing a carbon price floor.

The UK has aligned itself with European states calling for robust backloading of up to 1.2 billion carbon allowances to shore up the EU’s ailing carbon market.

Isaac Valero, the spokesman for EU Climate Commissioner Connie Hedegaard, said the EU climate policy showed how a united continent could deliver in Britain’s best interests.

“The UK is a driving force in shaping positively the European climate agenda,” he told EURACTIV in an emailed statement. “A proactive and trusted partner, the UK brings in a great deal of expertise and enthusiasm to our climate policies.”

But within the UK’s governing Conservative party, more power is thought to lie in the hands of politicians such as the chancellor, George Osborne, and a Eurosceptic right, which is equally suspicious of climate science and federalism.   

True believers

“The public affairs campaigners, the deniers, the oil companies and chemical companies have all tried to make a link between euro-scepticism and climate-scepticism, arguing that they are both bogus and outdated ideas,” Spencer, a pro-European, said.

“Individual parliamentarians of centre-right arties across Europe have been the prime target of the denial campaign for the last three years, a deliberate attempt to cultivate the idea that if you’re a eurosceptic, if you’re a true believer in the free market, you wouldn’t want to pay for all these expensive things that are unproven,” he said.

Shortly after his election, Cameron famously told civil servants at the Department of Energy and Climate Change that he wanted to head “the greenest government ever”.

His then-environment minister Chris Huhne said he wanted to go “further and faster than ever before” in tackling climate change, but was subsequently forced from office in a scandal over a speeding offence.

Cameron is sincere in his vision but hindered by a lack of power in his party, according to Jules Peck, an environmental advisor to the current-PM while in opposition.

“There’s a big rump of the party that Cameron has to battle with who don’t give a damn about Europe and don’t give a damn about climate change,” Peck told EURACTIV. “Us greenies say that the best thing about Europe is the environmental policy but the problem is that that’s exactly what the Tories don’t like about it: the environmental policy.”

Peck was the director of Cameron’s Quality of Life commission, and co-wrote the Conservative Party’s Blueprint for a Green Economy in 2007.

British Prime Minister David Cameron, who has been largely critical of the EU, entered an uneasy government coalition in 2010 with the pro-European Liberal Democrat party.

But as the eurozone eyed greater fiscal, banking and possibly even political integration to sovereign solve its debt crisis, Cameron came under growing pressure from the rebellious right wing of his party for a new referendum on EU membership.

On 23 January, he announced that, if re-elected, he would call such a poll by 2017, after negotiating a new compact with the EU.

  • 1 April 2013: UK government to introduce a carbon price floor
  • 2017: Britain to hold an in/out referendum on EU membership if David Cameron is re-elected

European Commission

British political parties

Subscribe to our newsletters

Subscribe