Football: Brexit risk puts Premier League on defensive

Cardiff City versus Crystal Palace. Cardiff, September 2010. [Jon Candy/Flickr]

The possibility of Britain voting to leave the European Union in its 23 June referendum leaves the lucrative and globally popular English Premier League facing an uncertain future.

For some, Britain leaving the EU would have a positive impact, fully opening up the Premier League to the world whilst also enabling home-grown footballers to find their feet without competition from cheap European imports.

But for others, a Brexit would make it harder for English clubs to attract top European players, weakening the league and jeopardising its money-spinning commercial contracts.

West Ham United vice-chairman Karren Brady warned last year that “cutting ourselves off from Europe would have devastating consequences”.

Her fears relate to freedom of movement laws that currently enable English clubs to sign EU players without having to offer them work permits.

Non-EU players must satisfy criteria regarding how many international appearances they have made and how strong their national team is in order to be granted visas, although exemptions can be granted.

A study by The Guardian published in September showed that two thirds of Premier League players from the EU would not meet these criteria.

They include the Manchester United quartet of David de Gea, Morgan Schneiderlin, Juan Mata and Anthony Martial and the Chelsea defenders Kurt Zouma and Cesar Azpilicueta.

Fewer stars means less international appeal, potentially presenting rival championships such as Spain’s La Liga or Germany’s Bundesliga with an opportunity to muscle in on the Premier League’s commercial territory.

No more Bale-outs?

The Premier League has not publicly taken a stance on the referendum, but in a speech last October, executive vice-chairman Richard Scudamore said: “I believe we, in the UK, must be in Europe from a business perspective.”

England’s Football Association has also refused to comment, but as the protector of the English game, it would appear to have more to gain from a Brexit than the unapologetically internationalist Premier League.

Clubs would find it harder to fill their squads with European players, which could make it easier for British players to make their way in the game.

The FA is determined to arrest a slide in the number of England-eligible players playing in the Premier League, and has already introduced rules tightening up the visa application process for non-EU players.

Wayne Harling, a member of the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP), believes that leaving Europe would smooth the development path for home-grown players such as 18-year-old Manchester United newcomer Marcus Rashford.

“Rashford is only playing because of an injury crisis, but the problem with having so many EU players in the Premier League is that people like him usually wouldn’t be given a chance,” Harling told AFP.

“The academies aren’t able to push players on to full-time contracts because they find it cheaper to recruit an established player from overseas.”

While British players have traditionally been reluctant to play abroad, leaving the EU would also make it more difficult for stars like Gareth Bale, who left Tottenham Hotspur for Real Madrid in 2013, to move to the continent.

‘Highly talented players’

Freed from the requirement to distinguish between EU and non-EU players, the English top flight could become a truly global league, with leading players from South America, Africa and Asia just as likely to be signed as those from Belgium or France.

Many of the Premier League’s big names are already non-Europeans, from Manchester City’s Argentine striker Sergio Aguero to Leicester City’s Algerian sensation Riyad Mahrez.

Some think it is likely, however, that the game’s governing bodies would push the government to mitigate the effect of a Brexit.

“I see there being a shift in the work permit rules, if indeed there is a Brexit, because the government is likely to want to maintain British clubs’ ability to sign the top European talent,” Daniel Lowen, partner at leading sports law firm Couchmans, told AFP.

“That may be through a watering down of the work permit rules generally or through specific exceptions to immigration rules for highly talented players.”

During his campaign fro re-election in 2015, British Prime Minister David Cameron promised to renegotiate the UK's relations with the European Union and organise a referendum to decide whether or not Britain should remain in the 28-member bloc.

The British PM said he will campaign for Britain to remain in the EU after a two-day summit in Brussels where he obtained concessions from the 27 other EU leaders to give Britain “special status” in the EU.

Cameron clinches reform deal after benefits compromise

UK Prime Minister David Cameron on Friday night (19 February) said he would campaign for Britain to stay in a reformed EU, after securing promises of treaty change and compromising on his demands over benefits for EU migrants and their children.

But EU leaders had their red lines, and ruled out changing fundamental EU principles, such as the free movement of workers, and a ban on discriminating between workers from different EU states.

The decision on whether to stay or go could have far-reaching consequences for trade, investment and Great Britain's position on the international scene.

The campaign will be bitterly contested in a country with a long tradition of euroscepticism and a hostile right-wing press, with opinion polls showing Britons are almost evenly divided.

  • 23 June: Britain holds in/out referendum on the European Union

Subscribe to our newsletters