British Prime Minister Boris Johnson sparked fury among pro-Europeans and MPs opposed to a no-deal Brexit by forcing the suspension of parliament weeks before Britain’s EU departure date.
The pound slid on the surprise news Wednesday (28 August), which opponents branded a “coup” and a “declaration of war” but Johnson claimed was necessary to allow him to pursue a “bold and ambitious” new domestic agenda.
It came a day after opposition parties vowed to seek legislative changes to prevent a no-deal Brexit.
Queen Elizabeth II approved the request to end what has been the longest session of parliament in nearly 400 years in the second week of September and reopen it on 14 October – just over two weeks before Brexit. An EU summit is scheduled on 17-18 October.
Thousands of people protested in London, Manchester, Edinburgh and other cities, while an online petition decrying the decision had garnered more than 1.1 million signatures by early Thursday.
At the biggest rally, crowds gathered near parliament in London chanting “stop the coup” and waving EU flags.
“Parliament will have the opportunity to debate the government’s overall programme, and approach to Brexit,” Johnson, who leads the Conservative party, vowed in a letter to MPs.
However, his decision incensed lawmakers vehemently against Britain leaving the EU without a deal on 31 October.
Jeremy Corbyn, leader of the main opposition Labour Party, denounced the move as “a smash-and-grab against democracy” and reiterated he may call a no-confidence vote in Johnson’s government, which commands a majority of just one seat.
Former chancellor Philip Hammond also pledged to keep fighting against no deal.
“It would be a constitutional outrage if parliament were prevented from holding the government to account at a time of national crisis,” he said.
US President Donald Trump weighed into the row by praising Johnson as “great” and claiming it would be “very hard” for Corbyn to topple him in a no-confidence vote.
The Labour leader shot back, tweeting Johnson was “a compliant Prime Minister who will hand Britain’s public services and protections over to US corporations in a free trade deal”.
In the seismic 2016 referendum on Britain’s EU membership, 52% voted in favour of leaving the bloc, a result that has left parliament and the country bitterly divided.
Johnson insists Britain must leave by the 31 October deadline — already twice-delayed — with or without a divorce deal from Brussels.
Parliament has rejected three times the withdrawal agreement struck between Brussels and the government of Johnson’s predecessor Theresa May.
Opposition lawmakers called it a “blind Brexit” while eurosceptics objected to a so-called “backstop” provision to keep the Irish border open for people and goods, which would keep Britain closely aligned with the EU.
Johnson wants the EU to drop the backstop measure entirely — something Brussels has repeatedly ruled out.
In Paris, Britain’s Brexit Secretary Stephen Barclay told a business conference Wednesday the EU would be blamed for a “lack of flexibility” on the backstop issue in the event of no deal.
The government’s chief Brexit adviser David Frost was in Brussels for talks, but an EU summit on 17-18 October will likely determine whether there is any scope for compromise.
If not, Britain will end its four decades of membership without a deal governing future trade relations and citizens’ rights.
Asked to comment on the UK’s decision to suspend parliament, Commission Chief spokesperson Mina Andreeva said on Wednesday that the EU executive doesn’t comment on internal procedures in member states, and that it is not going to speculate what it means in terms of next steps in the UK’s parliamentary Brexit procedure.
“I think it’s for the UK to answer”, Andreeva said.
Swedish politician Carl Bildt tweeted: “I have been Prime Minister once upon a time. The possibility to just send Parliament packing for a period would undoubtedly have been attractive at times. But our democracy would never allow this. Rightly so, by the way.”
I have been Prime Minister once upon a time. The possibility to just send Parliament packing for a period would undoubtedly have been attractive at times. But our democracy would never allow this. Rightly so, by the way.
— Carl Bildt (@carlbildt) August 28, 2019
The pound slumped more than one percent at one point but shares rose as London-listed multinationals stand to gain from a weaker currency.
Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon accused Johnson of acting like a “tinpot dictator” by pushing through an “outrageous assault on basic democratic principles”.
Meanwhile, Ruth Davidson, Conservative leader in Scotland, was set to resign Thursday in part due to opposition to Johnson’s hardline Brexit strategy, according to reports.
More than 70 parliamentarians have launched a fast-track legal bid at the highest civil court in Scotland, aimed at preventing Johnson from suspending parliament.
Lawyers for Gina Miller, a businesswoman and leading anti-Brexit campaigner, said they were also challenging parliament’s suspension in English courts.
The prime minister’s move dominated the newspapers Thursday, with The Times saying Johnson had “pushed Britain to the brink of a constitutional crisis” while The Guardian predicted a “historic Parliamentary clash” as his opponents seek to prevent a no-deal Brexit. The Financial Times in an editorial said Johnson’s suspension of parliament “is an affront to democracy”.
“Boris Johnson has detonated a bomb under the constitutional apparatus of the United Kingdom.” – the Financial Times editorial board not mincing words… https://t.co/hrHYrqjpT7 pic.twitter.com/A4wZwFhAbo
— Andrew Stroehlein (@astroehlein) August 29, 2019
Parliament typically goes into recess around the annual party conference season, which kicks off on 14 September and ends on 2 October.
Robert Craig, a constitutional expert at Durham University, said there was “theoretically absolutely nothing wrong” with the suspension, noting it was normal for a new leader to start a fresh parliamentary session.
“But the reason that it is causing outrage is because it’s reducing the number of available days for parliament to stop a no-deal.”
John Bercow, the speaker of parliament’s lower House of Commons, who was not forewarned about Johnson’s suspension decision, labelled it a “constitutional outrage”.
Speaker John Bercow: “I have had no contact from the Government, but if the reports that it is seeking to prorogue Parliament are confirmed, this move represents a constitutional outrage.”
— Nick Eardley (@nickeardleybbc) August 28, 2019
“It is blindingly obvious that the purpose of prorogation now would be to stop parliament debating Brexit,” he said.