Array ( [0] => article-50 [1] => boris-johnson [2] => brexit [3] => euroscepticism [4] => future-eu [5] => jeremy-corbyn [6] => liam-fox [7] => owen-smith [8] => theresa-may [9] => uk-europe [10] => uk-referendum-on-europe [11] => united-kingdom [12] => future_eu [13] => politics [14] => uk_europe )

May demands Brexit ‘action plans’ at Chequers meeting this week

British Prime Minister Theresa May will summon her ministers for a meeting this week to outline Brexit 'action plans'. [Number10gov/Flickr]

British Prime Minister Theresa May will demand Brexit ‘action plans’ from her ministers, at a meeting to be held at Chequers, her official country residence, later this week.

The meeting, as ministers return from their summer holidays, comes amid confusion as to whether May will trigger Article 50, starting the UK’s withdrawal from the EU, by allowing MPs a vote in the House of Commons, or not.

Attempts by last week to discern whether a vote of MPs was a legal necessity were met without response.

At the weekend the Daily Telegraph reported that the new PM wanted to trigger Article 50 without a vote in parliament.

A Downing Street spokesperson told the newspaper that May was “committed to delivering on the verdict the public gave” in the 23 June referendum, which saw the UK vote to leave the 28-member bloc by 52% to 48%.

Flanders eyes post-Brexit North Sea union

With Britain leaving the European Union, its neighbours and historic trading partners in Flanders think it is time to revive efforts to forge a new North Sea union to tighten links around shared waters.

It has since become a major issue in the opposition Labour party leadership campaign, with challenger Owen Smith promising to oppose Brexit at any vote in the House of Commons, and current leader Jeremy Corbyn stating the verdict of the referendum must be respected.

Whether it will actually come to a vote of MPs, a majority of whom are opposed to Brexit, remains to be seen.

May’s government already faces a legal challenge to prevent it beginning the process of leaving the EU without an act of parliament.

Lawyers from the Mishcon de Reya law firm are poised to challenge the government in the English High Court, arguing that May cannot trigger Article 50 of the EU’s Lisbon Treaty – the two-year legal process for leaving the bloc – without a parliamentary debate and vote authorising her to do so.

Most members of parliament’s lower House of Commons, including May, campaigned for Britain to remain in the EU.

Once Article 50 is triggered, it would start a two-year countdown to Britain’s exit from the European Union.

May has said it will not be triggered this year, the government needing time to shape Britain’s exit objectives first.

Frankfurt charm offensive for Brexit-wary London firms

The marketing team of Frankfurt never expected its English-language dummy website to attract new businesses would actually go live after Britain’s European Union referendum.

The prime minister, who replaced David Cameron in the weeks after the shock British vote, is due to host ministers at her country residence this week, demanding “action plans” from each department about how they can make the most of Brexit, according to the Sunday Times and Sunday Telegraph.

Ministers will “discuss the next steps in the negotiations,” a government source told the Telegraph, before the prime minister heads to China for a meeting of G20 world leaders.

The summer break saw leaking between Boris Johnson, the new Foreign Secretary, and Liam Fox, the Minister for International Trade, in an apparent war over expanding their responsibilities in the Brexit negotiations.

Meanwhile Gus O’Donnell, the former head of the civil service, said Brexit was not inevitable and Britain could still remain a part of a changed EU.

“It very much depends what happens to public opinion and whether the EU changes” before Britain is ready to leave, he told The Times newspaper.

“It might be that the broader, more loosely aligned group, is something that the UK is happy being a member of.”

He told BBC radio that elections in France and Germany next year meant “it is not even clear which leaders our prime minister will be negotiating with, so I don’t think there’s any great rush to do it.”


Britain’s shock vote to leave the EU in a 23 June referendum has raised questions over the process and time frame for an EU country to leave the Union.

Technically, the UK must give legal notice under Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty of its desire to quit the EU in order to start the process. However, the text makes no mention of a time frame, beyond the two-years of negotiation that will then follow for the leaving country to find a new settlement with the EU.

Britain appears in no rush to trigger the process, however. Theresa May, the new Prime Minister, said the UK will not invoke Article 50 until Britain's objectives for a post-Brexit settlement with the EU are clear. "That is why I have said already that this will not happen before the end of this year".

Setting off Article 50 in early 2017 seems the most likely scenario, meaning the negotiation process would last into 2019, when the next EU elections are held.

Brexit could be delayed to late-2019

Britain's exit from the European Union could be delayed until at least late 2019 because the government was too "chaotic" to start the two-year process early next year, the Sunday Times reported, citing sources it said were briefed by ministers.

Here is what Article 50 actually says:

  • Article 50(2): ‘A Member State which decides to withdraw shall notify the European Council of its intention. In the light of the guidelines provided by the European Council, the Union shall negotiate and conclude an agreement with that State, setting out the arrangements for its withdrawal, taking account of the framework for its future relationship with the Union. That agreement shall be negotiated in accordance with Article 218(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. It shall be concluded on behalf of the Union by the Council, acting by a qualified majority, after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament.’
  • Article 50(3): “The Treaties shall cease to apply to the State in question from the date of entry into force of the withdrawal agreement or, failing that, two years after the notification referred to in paragraph 2, unless the European Council, in agreement with the Member State concerned, unanimously decides to extend this period.”
  • Article 50(4): “For the purposes of paragraphs 2 and 3, the member of the European Council or of the Council representing the withdrawing Member State shall not participate in the discussions of the European Council or Council or in decisions concerning it. A qualified majority shall be defined in accordance with Article 238(3)(b) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.”
  • Article 50(5): “If a State which has withdrawn from the Union asks to rejoin, its request shall be subject to the procedure referred to in Article 49.”

Everything you need to know about Article 50

Most people will have never read a single article of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) before they stumbled recently across the much reported on Article 50. Here is Andrew Duff’s comprehensive guide to the many aspects of Article 50.

Further Reading

Towards the post-Brexit relationship

EURACTIV's live coverage of the new UK government beginning to deal with the country's exit from the EU unfolded like this...

Subscribe to our newsletters