Van Rompuy to Cameron: ‘We have an exit clause’

Van Rompuy November 2012.jpg

Herman Van Rompuy, European Council President, issued his strongest warning yet to Britain, saying in a speech in London yesterday (28 February) that the EU's door was open to those in the club who want to leave.

Van Rompuy, who chairs the regular meeting of EU national leaders, said Britain had a chance to play a leading role in building the European economy now the euro zone had the "artillery" of economic tools to get itself out of the worst crisis in its history.

But Van Rompuy laced his speech in London's financial district with a clear warning to Cameron: Europe will not countenance any attempt by Britain to win an 'a-la-carte' membership, picking and choosing which of the European Union's rules it will follow and which to reject.

He cautioned Prime Minister David Cameron that the bloc's other leaders do not want to renegotiate Europe's founding treaties and that simpler means were available for Britain to redefine its relationship to Europe.

"Leaving the club altogether, as a few advocate, is legally possible," Van Rompuy said. "We have an 'exit clause'.

"But it's not a matter of just walking out. It would be legally and politically a most complicated and unpractical affair. Just think of a divorce after 40 years of marriage."

"Leaving is an act of free will and perfectly legitimate but it doesn't come for free," he said in a speech to bankers and politicians at the Guildhall, an 800-year-old institution that is a symbol of British merchant power in the City of London.

Cameron has promised to try to claw back powers from the EU and put any new settlement to voters in an in-out referendum by the end of 2017, heightening fears that Britain could leave the club it joined 40 years ago, in 1973.

"The wish to redefine your country's relationship with the Union has not gone unnoticed," said Van Rompuy, a former premier of EU founding member Belgium. "I cannot speak on behalf of the other presidents and prime ministers, but I presume they neither particularly like it, nor particularly fear it."

Treaty changes?

Cameron, a Conservative who says he wants Britain to stay inside the world's biggest economic bloc, warned in a speech on Jan. 23 that the European public was disillusioned with the EU and that Britain needed a new settlement.

British opponents of the European Union say it is a doomed project which has been imposed on European populations by an arrogant elite and that Britain should seek to go it alone.

Van Rompuy said Europe's leaders could not afford complacency and that bold reforms were needed to strengthen the euro zone, but that the integration ahead did not require further treaty changes.

"I see no impending need to open the EU treaties," he said, adding that Britain's ambivalent relations with Europe were undermining its negotiating position.

"How do you convince a room full of people when you keep your hand on the door handle?"

Van Rompuy's insistence on no treaty change undermined Cameron's strategy for getting Britain a new type of EU membership, said former EU Commissioner Peter Mandelson.

"The prime minister has made great play of radical treaty change – which he believes is necessary, which will provide the vehicle for the repatriation of powers that he wants. President Van Rompuy seemed to shoot that fox," Mandelson told Reuters.

"If there is not going to be such a new treaty, I don't know what the alternative vehicle will be for what the prime minister wants: you cannot have a unilateral negotiation."

Van Rompuy said a club producing one fifth of global gross domestic product gave its members a clout they would not have alone. But he dodged a direct question on whether a provisional EU deal to cap pay bonuses would damage the City of London, a major contributor to Britain's economy.

He said the 2008 global financial crisis had exposed the weakness of the European common currency project and kept open the chance of further "aftershocks".

"Talk of imminent break-up has vanished. It is finally sinking in that the euro is here to stay, and that this is due to deep political determination," he said. "Even if there may be turbulence ahead, we have the artillery we need."

Under pressure from Eurosceptic politicians, the UK Government launched a "Balance of Competences Review" last summer to provide the British public with an "objective analysis of Britain’s relationship with the EU."

In a commentary published on EURACTIV, Britain's Europe Minister David Lidington wrote that the review "will produce 32 reports over the next two years, looking at everything the EU does and how it affects the UK, from the environment to education to EU enlargement".

Lidington stressed that the review will not make specific recommendations and "is not designed as a prelude to cherry-picking the Treaties, or to British exit from the EU". Rather, it will provide evidence for an informed and "serious debate in the UK," he wrote.

>> Read Lidington's commentary: What does EU membership mean for the UK?

UK Prime Minister David Cameron promised in January to offer Britons a simple ‘in-out’ referendum choice on whether to stay in the European Union if he wins the next election, scheduled for 2015.

>> Read: Cameron takes gamble with in/out EU referendum pledge

Cameron's referendum pledge seems to resonate with public opinion.

Given an in-out referendum on EU membership tomorrow, 50% would vote “out” against 33% “in” and 17% who would not vote either way, according to a Harris Interactive poll published in February.

>> Read: Poll shows half of Brits would vote to leave the EU

European Council

UK Government

Subscribe to our newsletters