Why Brexit is good for the UK and the EU

DISCLAIMER: All opinions in this column reflect the views of the author(s), not of EURACTIV Media network.

Pro Leave campaigners rally outside of the Parliament in London, Britain, 29 January 2019. [Andy Rain/EPA/EFE]

There is an anti-EU virus in the British body politic of particularly virulent strain. It experienced a long period of hibernation and can be found in both major political parties, writes Fraser Cameron.

Fraser Cameron is Visiting Professor at the Hertie School of Governance, Berlin, and Senior Advisor to the European Policy Centre.

As a convinced pro-European Brit I never thought I would suggest that the UK needs a break from the EU. But the truth is there is an anti-EU virus in the British body politic that can only be cured by a period in the wilderness. No one can judge whether this will be 5, 10 or 15 years but hopefully it will lead to a new generation of politicians free from the virus and the UK can rejoin the EU and help make it stronger.

Like most viruses, the anti-EU virus experienced a long period of hibernation and can be found in both major political parties. It is one of the ironies that it was a Conservative prime minister, Edward Heath, who led Britain into the EU, and another Margaret Thatcher, who was the strongest supporter of the Single Market. In 1975, it was a Labour prime minister, Harold Wilson, who sought to unite his divided party by offering (and winning 70-30) a referendum on Europe. Among those voting against was a certain Jeremy Corbyn.

Labour continued to be divided over Europe in the 1980s leading to a split in the party and 18 years in opposition. Meanwhile, as Thatcher was forced out of office in 1990, largely because of her strident opposition to the EU, the Tory party started to split on Europe. John Major, who returned from Maastricht shouting ‘game, set and match’ to the UK, was confronted with a band of about 30 die-hard anti-EU rebels (‘the bastards’) who made his life a misery.

The virus then went into hibernation under the pro-EU Tony Blair who easily defeated two Tory leaders who ran anti-EU campaigns in the 2001 and 2005. Blair’s successor, Gordon Brown, lost the 2010 election to David Cameron who was able to see off growing demands for a referendum in his own party by pointing to the veto held by his coalition partners, the Liberal Democrats. Under pressure from Ukip, who Cameron famously called ‘a bunch of fruitcakes, loonies and closet racists,’ the prime minister yielded to calls to include a referendum in the party manifesto for the 2015 election. When Cameron unexpectedly won an outright majority he felt he had to go through with the referendum, believing that he could easily win it. The rest is history.

Cameron will probably go down as the worst prime minister in British history, although it looks as if Theresa May will run him a close second.  Her bunker mentality, lack of empathy, poor political judgement (losing her Commons majority in an unnecessary election in 2017) and inability to reach across the political divide, meant that she has struggled to reach an agreement with the EU.  And less than two months before Britain is due to leave on 29 March there is still no sign of an agreement.

The past two years have been characterised by an outpouring of anti-EU bile by mainly Conservative MPs and their supporters in the media. For the new foreign secretary, Jeremy Hunt, to compare the EU with the Soviet Union, was certainly not the worst of the comments. For a large swathe of the Tory Party, the EU was and is the enemy.

If Britain needed an effective opposition now was the time but Corbyn is fundamentally opposed to the EU believing it will stop him creating the socialist nirvana in the UK. More than a dozen anti-EU Labour MPs have effectively kept Theresa May in office during recent weeks.

With the UK outside the EU it will have no one to blame for its fate – although no doubt some will continue to heap blame on the EU for not allowing it a free hand in trade deals. Every government and expert report has pointed to the huge economic downside to leaving the EU. This could become apparent quite quickly with a fall in sterling and a rush of firms to relocate outside of Britain. The economic situation will inevitably have political repercussions including a possible break- up of the UK. There could also be a realignment of the very tribal party scene. One can only hope that in due course the electorate will come to their senses and elect a new crop of MPs less ideological and more pragmatic towards the EU

So why could Brexit be good for the EU?  Despite all its opt outs (euro, Schengen, justice and home affairs) the UK has never felt quite comfortable in the EU and has often blocked attempts, as in defence, to deepen integration. Now the EU has the chance to move forward without using the UK as an alibi. There are many important dossiers from reform of the Eurozone to defence and migration where the EU needs to deepen integration. It now has the chance to move forward without worrying about any British veto. If it can do this then it will demonstrate that the Brits were indeed responsible for the slow pace of integration. But given the many political problems in EU member states one cannot be too optimistic about such a scenario.

Most viruses die down or disappear over time. The British anti-EU virus is a particularly virulent strain and there were fears that it might take root elsewhere in the EU. But the shambles over Brexit has been a powerful antidote. At some point the virus will have run its course in the UK as well.

Subscribe to our newsletters